site hit counter

CO2 HOG

Please end all the Global Warming "HYSTERIA" - for the children.
Welcome to CO2 HOG Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

CO2 HOG

Global Warming: How Good Is the Science?

 
November 12th, 2007 by TK Kenyon

John Coleman, meteorologist and founder of the The Weather Channel, recently wrote an editorial on his KUSI (San Diego, CA) blog that stated in part, (scroll down to find the essay,) “[Global Warming] is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming… It is a SCAM…. Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda.”

And what does your humble Non-Majors Science Instructor say? 

Well, he has a point. 

The data that backs up the whole global warming theory is sketchy, at best. We’ve all seen the scary graph where the average recorded temperature line bobs along for a couple of centuries and then suddenly spikes up in the seventies. 

As a scientist, that graph impresses me, but any scientist would ask: Where does that data come from? The acquisition method determines the data. 

Now, most of the data points taken on that scary graph are from thermometers that are stationary and have been hanging in the same place for decades, even for over a century. 

On the surface, this ensures continuity of data. You don’t want to take the official temperature one day in the middle of a grassy park and the next day, five inches above the steaming asphalt, or five inches above a frozen-over pond. You’ve got to control the variables. The position of the thermometer is certainly a variable you must control. 

The problem with this is not day-to-day comparisons, but decade-to-decade comparisons. Many of these thermometers are now in the centers of huge cities. Urban heat island effect is well-documented and quite intuitive. The temperature in the centers of cities can be as much as twenty (20) Fahrenheit degrees warmer than surrounding rural areas. 

For example, the official thermometer in Phoenix, AZ is at Sky Harbor Airport. Three decades ago, Sky Harbor was on the edge of Phoenix and surrounded by cotton fields and empty desert. At night, the desert and raw soil cooled quickly, and the summer temperatures even in the center of Phoenix dropped into the sixties and seventies, Fahrenheit. 

Now, the cities of Phoenix, Tempe, Mesa, Glendale, Chandler, Scottsdale, etc., have grown together like merging cancer tumors into one huge, sprawling, asphalt-paved ubercity. In the summer, the blacktop absorbs the heat from the blazing sun all day long and reradiates it at night, so Phoenix does not cool below ninety degrees Fahrenheit for weeks, sometimes months. In 2007, the high temperature was over 110o Fahrenheit for 32 days. Sometimes, the low is above a hundred degrees. 

The official thermometer hangs in almost the very center of that hellhole, and I mean that the hot-enough-to-melt-sulfur sense. 

The urban heat island effect has certainly affected the average daily temperatures in the middle of Phoenix. That’s a localized climate change, however. Not a global climate change.

<>

http://www.bloggernews.net/111652

Published Monday, November 12, 2007 11:03 PM by Bad Hog

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

No Comments

Leave a Comment

(required) 
(optional)
(required) 
Submit